Well, guys, this is about attempt number 30 to 'catch up' with some comments and messages to some of the posters. Sometimes it would behoove me to let go of something, but (and this is one of those "dreaded 'buts' " that makes everything that one wants to do okay ) I've really wanted to do this.
Ladies and Gentlement, go read the Guidelines! Links _can_ be included by first following guideline 6:
NO SOLICITING: SI.com does not allow soliciting of any kind, publicly OR via Private Message. This includes links or URLs to other websites. If you have a product, service or website you believe to be in the interest of SI.com, please contact an Administrator.
That's how my 2nd post in this forum includes links. Sent the whole thing off and got "okay" in return. Upon reflection, BTW, I suspect that it might be better to do the "Mod, Please" post in general to grab some attention. Somebody usually replies with a PM pretty quickly.
Skan
Greetings to the collective consciousness known as Skan! (I've always wanted to say something like that.) Quickly google up 'Mentor of Arisia' for a Science Fiction viewpoint, examples are scattered throughout a lot of Science Fiction.
And, welcome. I am glad that you've found something that works for you. I have always respected your posts, they are all well reasoned, wewll considered, and helpful. I'm sorry that you have need of this particular section of SI, a fist bump to you }{
derealizingMe, why that particular name? What seems unreal? Is it a desire that things were unreal, an escape? Or is it one of derealization, depersonalization, or both together? Two answers are important, the immediate one and the considered, thoughtful one.
Reading your story was like reading my own, in places, themes, old reactions, generalized current approaches to life. There were, not triggers, but empathic commonality from times of deep personal pain. I apologize in advance if anything that I say is painful, but ( a "dreaded 'but' " ) one cannot get better without addressing the reality of and removing the splinter, leave it alone and it gets infected and a lot worse.
I have a difficult time relating to people ... even with the cloak of anonymity in the wild wild web I have major trust issues. As Gomer Pyle would say: 'Well Surprise, surprise, surprise.'
Yes, I get this. I understand, I agree, I've had those same thoughts and doubts about me, the world, other people.
First observation (don't worry, we all do this) - you open up with some truths, you admit trust issues (we all have those, too), and then you end with a joke. I'm going to go out on a bit of a limb here and say that that joke is you minimizing. Everyone minimizes. Minimizing is pretty socially ingrained. Look at the Brits with their 'keep a stiff upper lip' phrase and approach. I am not "calling you out" on minimizing, I am merely pointing it out. When we minimize look at the thing being minimized - it is usually either us or something that hurts. It can be selfish, too, when we minimize others.
I will try my best not to ramble on and keep it male-friendly (short, precise, and to the point).
Minimizing again. Not a bad thing by any means. It helps us to speak about those things that we really would rather not speak about. Only thing is - you have to be willing to go into emotional affects later, after the hard part of speaking is done.
Going into these things, being open about our really sucky experiences, is how healing occurs. Keeping it inside, encysted in layer upon layer of scar tissue, poor coping mechanisms, feeling isolated and unloved and unloveable, results in what usually happens with cysts. Somewhere, some time, somebody touches it and it explodes icky all over the place. In life the icky usually takes the form of poor self-worth, and getting into bad, injurious relationships and chancy, dangerous situations.
derealizingMe, that was my life. Can you see why I relate so strongly to your story so far (because there is oh, so much more of your story left untold)?
Your highschool exBF and exWH mixed up in a blender (what better fate, eh? ) are similar to my exWW. My story leading up to that relationship is probably way different in particulars but pretty similar to everyone else's on this thread: Dysfunction. Dysfunction personified. And recognizing that is _important_ because that dysfunction was directly tied to the CSA and that dysfunction marred every aspect of my life for a number of years.
I learned to lie about the abuse. I learned that I was unlovable and worthless. I learned that I was there for the sexual gratification of others. I learned to fear. I learned that my Mother would beat me bloody (in places easily concealed of course) on a relative whim. I learned about genital sex and oral sex and my pre-teen reading was stuff like the Kama Sutra and The Joy Of Sex. Oh, and the incest pornography that my Mother bought for her own, personal enjoyment. I was heavily sexualized, which is a thing by which everything is viewed in a sexual manner.
As YouMeI spoke of in a post on this thread, I thought that this was everyone's normal, sort of, and that it was common to say one thing in public and do other things at home. I internalized that and lied in public and about my sexual history? encounters? escapades? all through my teen and pre-teen years. There were other societal messages that were very confusing. "Don't tell lies" was a big one. "Treat others with respect" was a big one, too, and I've always tried to do that. It was all very, very confusing for a young man such as myself.
What I'm trying to get at rather long-windedly is that _I_ was responsible for me and I wasn't doing a very good job of it. The whole thing came to something of a head when I discovered that there was a bad thing called "child sexual abuse" and "childhood sexual abuse" and it was being studied. So I got everything that I could get my hands on. Another societal message that I got was that you could choose who you wanted to be and I hurt so much that I wanted to not do that anymore, so I read voraciously. Not to minimize, but there was a near/attempted suicide about 15 or 16 when my recently divorced parents were deciding to get back together. I was living with Dad, unsurprisingly, and I didn't want to go back. Not much of an attempt as things go because I was alone and I simply decided not to go through with it. It would have been simple and sure, but I decided that life was really a better thing and that one cannot foresee tomorrow.
All of the ancillary effects of CSA hadn't really been as fully explored and written about as they are today.
So, first (and only to date) wife I met in college. She, too, was a sort-of-survivor of CSA from her grandfather and we pain-bonded. We had first-date sex and kept on going, pretty much simple as that. We broke up once and when she confessed to having sex and staying the night with her pill supplier I just figured eh, sex is no big deal, and moved on. Remember the SI adage that hurt attracts hurt, broken attracts broken, and both attract predators? I wasn't healed when we met nor was I when we married and we let each other down in a lot of ways. Which might be minimizing -but- (another "dreaded 'but' " ) I don't want to write a biography here.
I'm getting rather wrapped up in re-telling my story and the only value in that, derealizingMe, is that I think that we have parallels.
We both pick relationship partners badly. I think that we have both picked relationships that weren't good for us but that were either pain-bonding or doing a thing called 'recreating the abuse'. Abused people put themselves in abusive situations to try and control the outcome, to make things different, to demonstrate to themselves that they finally can _control_ the abusive situation. And that's false, we can't control it because we can't control the abuser, but we try to and we always fail. The only way to control _their_ effects upon _us_ is to learn to value ourselves enough to not get into the situation in the first place. We rob them of power by not being alone with them, by learning that _we_ _are_ _valuable_, and by not allowing ourselves to get into chancy situations.
Me - FUBARD. Well ok, I'm exaggerating. Just need a lot of work (which I am on board to do!)
I get that, and that is the minimizing and deflecting (a bit, not too much) speaking again. Good job being on board to do the work! It is hard, and scary, and brings up a lot of the past, and you'll be more peaceful and happier for having done it.
CSA Survivor, Rape Survivor x2 (+.5?), Physical/mental Abuse survivor, misdiagnosed as Bi-polar now changed to PTSD/Anxiety/Major Depression, may be sex addict, codependent, DID etc etc.
Yeah, I got a few of those, too. Thing is, they're just best-guesses if they're done by people without experience in the particular area of Trauma, CSA, etc.
I got the sex addict diagnosis, too. Thing is, I wasn't. I'm not. This was a guy with a bright, shiny, new CSAT hung on his wall that was so new he hadn't yet updated his bio page on the group's web site. _Everyone_ was a sex addict to him. CSAT was his hammer and everyone else was a nail. Plus, money. He spoke to exWGF and I and immediately labeled me a sex addict and her a co-addict and then started talking about years of therapy and money and those were his primary subjects from then on. Years, money. But spend it! He can help us!
Understanding that I _wasn't_ a sex addict took a lot of research and support from people that were, or that lived with them. The responses of CSA victims _can_ result in "sexual addiction", which is a phrase that describes behaviors that are sometimes unlike addictions with which we are more familiar. Usually those behaviors are very like other addictions, but sometimes not quite. I think that, like 'multiple personality', 'mood swings' or 'bi-polar', "sexual addiction" will be broken down and renamed a bit more in future. But CSA can also result in behaviors that can mimic some behaviors of sex addiction, too. And treating those underlying traumas can cause the sexual-addiction-like behaviors to reduce such that sexual addiction is no longer a viable diagnosis.
I guess what I'm suggesting is that you come talk with folks here on SI about your diagnoses and basically get a second opinion. There are a few therapists on the board whose opinion is better than mine, for instance. On that same note, many employers have a program named EAP (Employee Assistance Program) and those often help with the first six or so visits to a therapist. They can also prepare lists of therapists based upon distance or specialty, if they have the specialty information. And they can list by male or female. Check it out throught the company HR or Benefits department. Oh, yeah, they don't report back to the company.
Whew, that wore me out right there!
No doubt, and good on you for talking about it! Truly, talking about it, starting to open up, realizing that one isn't alone, unloved and basically unloveable, is a _huge_ step.
It's kind of hard to find a starting point since one part of history relates to another and it is all relevant, so please bear with me if I jump from one to another and then back again full circle. And maybe you can recognize a couple of dysfunctional patterns here (I try to add more fun and less dys).
Here on SI we label statements of painful, eye-opening, truth 2x4's. I try to name mine. I haven't been doing it above, but I'm naming this one.
Here comes the 2x4 of Painful Truth. It isn't hard to find a starting point at all, it all started in the CSA. Everything that you've done, I've done something quite similar. I had to name those things to myself for my own healing and I'm going to name them for you, too. It might hurt, I'm not going to lie and say, "This won't hurt at all."
To try to heal from the various abuses of my exWH, I used unconventional methods.
Here comes the 2x4 of You Are Not Alone. derealizingMe, you are not alone. If you needed an appendectomy, would you do it yourself? If you had an eye poked out (I have), would you try to fix it yourself (I didn't)? Sister, I tried the same self-medication, self-developed self-healing methods as you (okay, not exactly, but very, very similar) and you know what? They resulted in _more_ self-harm because my (and your, dare I say) self-developed methods reinforced the very same messages that I had internalized for so very long -and- those messages were both so very wrong and so very hurtful for true healing.
I got involved with a couple in an open marriage and become good friends with the both of them.
Not open marriages here, well, not many (!), but I was involved in 'open/casual' relationships a good deal in my younger years. For me, those don't work in a healthy way. Here's why: I internalized the childhood messages that I wasn't worth anything. My mother said to me often, "I pity the woman that ever gets married to you." And so I avoided committed relathionships because _I_ knew that I wasn't worth anything. My relationships reflected that. Anybody that wanted any sort of commitment was avoided. I actually had the thought, "Well, they wouldn't want to commit if they knew me as well as I know me" a good number of times. That was me devaluing me.
Here's a true thing: You train people how to treat you by the treatment that you accept from them. If you continue to accept bad treatment then the other person learns that bad treatment is acceptable. It doesn't matter if you beg them to stop treating you badly, because by staying you continue to tell them that the treatment is acceptable. This concept is the entire basis of the SI quote, "In order to save the relationship you have to be ready to leave it." To expound on this a bit more, by staying, no matter how you're treated, you give up complete power and control over _how_ you're treated to another person. That is never acceptable long-term in a relationship where two are supposed to be equal.
This was, for me, the 2x4 of I Know My Place. For me, when I was involved in these kinds of relationships, I took the position in the relationship that you took - friendly third. There are few demands made of the friendly third because the real relationship is between the H and W. Both enjoy the friendly third because that's what a friendly third is for. However, I'll wager that if you had started making yourself a priority you'd have been out of the open marriage quite quickly simply because healthy requirements are not the province of the friendly third position. When it comes down to it, the friendly third position is mostly one of fuck-buddy and/or sex-toy. It doesn't require much of one and thus it feels 'good' and 'safe' to many a CSA victim/survivor. Being of minimal importance feels right to many of us. It reinforces messages from childhood. What could be wrong with that? Well, besides _everything_.
I got involved in the BDSM community.
Yep, all very familiar to me.
Prepare for the 2x4 of Unhealthy Is Unhealthy. So, in swinging parlance you were a Unicorn, an unattached, single, swinging female. They're much sought after. That position?, station? in life feels pretty good because we're wanted, or we can feel wanted, and since sex is just a thing (more on that later if I remember to), what can it matter because it feels good, right? As for BDSM, Dom, Sub, Switch - doesn't matter. The thing about the BDSM community is that they're really just following carefully defined roles in a dysfunctional dance. The Dom is supposed to show respect and caring by respecting boundaries and the Sub is supposed to show trust and loyalty both by obeying/subjugating themselves to the Dom and by continually pushing their boundaries.
Yeah, written out, does that sound like a really healthy relationship or division of power? The 'sub' position, commonly written as D/s to emphasize the minimization of the 'sub', is a form of 'recreating the abuse' that we suffered earlier. And the Dom? That's recreating the abuse, too, because we're giving ourselves up to the Dom in such a way as to mimic, in a false-choice driven fashion, the taking of power by the CSA perpetrator. We can, in our hidden minds, make all of the childhood stuff 'better' and less painful by recreating the abuse in adult life and fooling ourselves into thinking that that is a conscious decision and that we have control over the situation.
I'm sorry, derealizingMe, that you found out so horribly that you really didn't control the situation. That putting of ourselves into sketchy, dicey, chancy situations is a hallmark of sexual abuse and trauma. That is classic 'recreating the abuse' behavior and it is also classic that it backfires and hurts us more.
Fist bump of Been There, Done That, sister? }{ I _do_ understand.
I'm going to do a brief quote of hopefulkate from another thread from General:
DevotedMan ... once told me, Pain not transformed is transferred. A different take on hurt people, hurt people.
And add... Sometimes the people that we hurt are ourselves.
If it was a married couple, I always got to know the wife as well and I knew my boundaries.
derealizingMe, that last bit, "I knew my boundaries" speaks volumes about self-worth. About demanding that a relationship be equal between equals. I understand, again, BTDT.
I think I have to explain simply because of the fact that I cannot wrap my head around it.
Too many details and you risk offending some folks, which I have done by providing too many details.
I understand the "cannot wrap my head around it". Most sexual abuse (of which physical rape is only one form) are perpetrated by someone we know and trust. That betrayal is on them, not us. We are often left asking, "what did I _do_" and that question is an attempt to shift blame onto ourselves and we do _that_ because if it is our fault then we can exercise some control over it.
We can't. We cannot control the actions of another. The only thing that we _can_ do is learn to recognize sketchy, dicey, chancy people and situations and do our best to avoid them in future. We don't deserve bad treatment even when put ourselves in situations where bad treatment can easily result.
Right now I am in my house, sitting at my computer facing the street. Across the street lives an older woman. She _could_ have been stockpiling gunpowder and explosives for years and she _could_ choose this moment to set them off (in which case you'll never see this post but you'll read about me in the papers and not know that it was me). That's being as safe as I can be and not taking risks. What is _not_ safe for my emotional well-being is walking to the bar down the street and picking up a ONS partner because why should I trust them?
derealizingMe, please believe me when I say that I am not putting you down. I am not putting you anywhere other than "equal posting, hurt person, posting person." The biggest service that I can do for you is to be honest with my equal person (you) and try to give you my background, experiences, and insights. As they say on SI, "take what you _need_ and leave the rest."
The rest of your story, which I am neither ignoring nor minimizing, mirrors my own as well, though specific events and sequences are a bit different.
Here comes the 2x4 of Don't Minimize, It Hurt - legally, morally, ethically, drunk people cannot give consent. They cannot. One of the first things that alcohol does is diminish the inhibition centers of the brain. Then it removes the ability to reason, coordination, and other things. It brings lethargy and screws with the time sense. It removes the ability to recognize danger. There's the old redneck joke that predicts catastrophe with the words, "Here, hold ma beer! Watch this!"
You were victimized. You had absolutely no control over that. It could have happened drunk or sober. There are three responses that people have - fight/flight/quiet. The "quiet" response is just that, you don't really fight or put up resistance. You become compliant. We learned in childhood that to resist is to be abused more, we have no ability to resist effectively, and so we simply shut down. There is no shame in that response. Even guys who have gone through intense, realistic training in the Armies of the world sometimes react to real, live conflict by hunkering into a ball in the trenches. It is normal, known, and understood. It doesn't mean that you wanted the abuse, not at all. It just means that that is your abuse survival mechanism.
derealizingMe, you've had a hell of a life, as have we all in here (and SI in general) and there is no shame or blame to be attached to you. You did your best with what you had and what you knew.
Frankly, truthfully, honestly, authentically, I am proud to call you my Sister in Adversity. }{ You're young, you have so much to look forward to in life. It _will_ be okay. Maybe hard in spots, but okay.
Also, re: posting links - you can name the music by title and I think that it is acceptable to do something like "listening to From The Inside on the 'tube". Loves me some Queen, Alice Cooper, The Who, I do. And MTA by The Kingston Trio is hilarious and catchy. Read about it and then listen to it. Oh, "Guitar and Pen" by The Who never got enough air time...
You're alone above the street somewhere
Wondering how you'll ever count out there.
You can walk, you can talk, you can fight
But inside you've got something to write
In your hand you hold your only friend
Never spend your guitar or your pen
Your guitar or your pen!
listen to it while the lyrics are up, really powerful. More not played enough are "From The Inside" and "For Veronica's Sake", "How You Gonna See Me Now", by Alice Cooper (loved that whole album). Creepily enough, "Rough Boys" by Pete Townshend is a good one, as are "Lola" and "Walk on the Wild Side". I say creepily because some of my abusers were male. I struggled with that a good bit.
Okay, that was one of the hardest things that I've written to date. That's on me, my experiences, my problems. I'm taking a break for a bit, more later... as I continue catching up.